Thirty-one theses on dating capitalism

26 / 31

THESIS XXVI

PART THREE — REFUSALS

Removing a filter is not the same as removing the sorting.

The menu disappeared. The distribution remained.

Every major platform disabled ethnicity filtering in 2020. The published response-rate analyses that OkCupid conducted on its own users, later collected by Christian Rudder, had already shown consistent penalties applied to Black users and particularly to Black women, and those patterns are produced by aggregated individual behaviour rather than by a drop-down menu. The filter was the visible instrument. The distribution it expressed remains in the data, and no company has published the distribution since.

EVIDENCE SNAPSHOT

Removed

VISIBLE FILTER

Visible ethnicity control removed from the interface

Persist

SORTING PATTERNS

Underlying behavioural sorting patterns may still persist

Black users

HISTORICAL PENALTY

Historical platform data showed penalties for Black users

Unpublished

CURRENT DATA

Current response distributions have not been published

KEY FINDING

Every major platform disabled ethnicity filtering in 2020.

IMPLICATION

Removing a discriminatory control does not automatically remove discriminatory sorting.

Source apparatus

SOURCE 01

|

PLATFORM-DATA ANALYSIS

Rudder, C. (2014). Dataclysm: Who we are when we think no one's looking. Crown.